Δευτέρα 25 Φεβρουαρίου 2019

Chondrocutaneous Bilateral Advancement Flap with Postoperative Radiation Therapy for a Helical Rim Keloid

Abstract

Keloids can be recalcitrant, and a well-planned treatment strategy is essential. Multiple ear piercings have recently become popular, particularly among younger age groups. Management of keloids that develop after piercing of the ear cartilage may be particularly problematic. Helical rim keloids are difficult to excise because of the complex, three-dimensional, cartilaginous structure of the helix and its thin and tightly adherent covering layer of skin. The chondrocutaneous advancement flap introduced by Antia and Buch may be a useful reconstructive option for a helical rim keloid after marginal loss of a segment of the helix as a result of trauma, a burn, or excision of a malignant tumor. However, this technique is limited to wounds that involve only the helix. In this technical note, we describe the use of a chondrocutaneous bilateral advancement flap with postoperative radiation therapy to treat a more invasive and relatively large keloid on the scapha. This technique is straightforward and safe in terms of preserving the blood supply. The addition of adjuvant radiation therapy can help to decrease the risk of recurrence and preserve the morphological structure of the ear and patient satisfaction.

Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2StqOYA

Commentary: Endoscopic Transaxillary Versus Inframammary Approaches for Breast Augmentation Using Shaped Implants: A Matched Case–Control Study



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2XmioG6

Invited Commentary on Caudal Septal Extension Graft Sutured with Absorbable Material and Not Fixed to the Nasal Spine Region Compared with the Conventional Fixation Method: A Retrospective Study



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2SqybQs

A Revision Mandibuloplasty: Causes, Indications, Surgical Methods and Treatment Outcomes

Abstract

Background

This paper aims to propose a classification system to categorize patients undergoing revision mandibuloplasty according to their dissatisfaction types. This paper also introduces various appropriate revision techniques and evaluates their outcomes. Through this classification system and suggested surgical techniques, surgeons can settle the disappointments experienced by patients after their primary mandibuloplasty, by realizing more natural-looking results.

Methods

The study subjects consisted of 184 patients who underwent a revision mandibuloplasty from October 2010 to March 2016, conducted by a single surgeon at a single institution. The authors were able to classify the dissatisfaction into two primary types—(1) lack of an overall slender frontal facial contour and (2) unnatural and asymmetrical overall facial appearance due to over- or inaccurate resection of the bone. A self-evaluation of patient's subjective satisfaction based on the scale from 1 to 5, both after the primary operation and after revision surgery, was compared.

Results

Dissatisfaction type I accounted for 145 patients (78.8 percent). The number of patients classified into dissatisfaction type II was 39 (21.2 percent). Of the patients categorized into type I, those undergoing revision surgeries due to an under-corrected mandibular tubercle and parasymphysis showed the most remarkable improvement in self-satisfaction score after reoperation—from 2.3 to 4.0.

Conclusion

To realize a natural-looking outcome in facial look through mandibular contouring, it is important not only to carefully consider the ratio and shape essential for an optimal slender facial contour, but also to minimize unnecessary resection of the bone.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2XlnXVm

Chondrocutaneous Bilateral Advancement Flap with Postoperative Radiation Therapy for a Helical Rim Keloid

Abstract

Keloids can be recalcitrant, and a well-planned treatment strategy is essential. Multiple ear piercings have recently become popular, particularly among younger age groups. Management of keloids that develop after piercing of the ear cartilage may be particularly problematic. Helical rim keloids are difficult to excise because of the complex, three-dimensional, cartilaginous structure of the helix and its thin and tightly adherent covering layer of skin. The chondrocutaneous advancement flap introduced by Antia and Buch may be a useful reconstructive option for a helical rim keloid after marginal loss of a segment of the helix as a result of trauma, a burn, or excision of a malignant tumor. However, this technique is limited to wounds that involve only the helix. In this technical note, we describe the use of a chondrocutaneous bilateral advancement flap with postoperative radiation therapy to treat a more invasive and relatively large keloid on the scapha. This technique is straightforward and safe in terms of preserving the blood supply. The addition of adjuvant radiation therapy can help to decrease the risk of recurrence and preserve the morphological structure of the ear and patient satisfaction.

Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2StqOYA

Commentary: Endoscopic Transaxillary Versus Inframammary Approaches for Breast Augmentation Using Shaped Implants: A Matched Case–Control Study



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2XmioG6

Invited Commentary on Caudal Septal Extension Graft Sutured with Absorbable Material and Not Fixed to the Nasal Spine Region Compared with the Conventional Fixation Method: A Retrospective Study



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2SqybQs

A Revision Mandibuloplasty: Causes, Indications, Surgical Methods and Treatment Outcomes

Abstract

Background

This paper aims to propose a classification system to categorize patients undergoing revision mandibuloplasty according to their dissatisfaction types. This paper also introduces various appropriate revision techniques and evaluates their outcomes. Through this classification system and suggested surgical techniques, surgeons can settle the disappointments experienced by patients after their primary mandibuloplasty, by realizing more natural-looking results.

Methods

The study subjects consisted of 184 patients who underwent a revision mandibuloplasty from October 2010 to March 2016, conducted by a single surgeon at a single institution. The authors were able to classify the dissatisfaction into two primary types—(1) lack of an overall slender frontal facial contour and (2) unnatural and asymmetrical overall facial appearance due to over- or inaccurate resection of the bone. A self-evaluation of patient's subjective satisfaction based on the scale from 1 to 5, both after the primary operation and after revision surgery, was compared.

Results

Dissatisfaction type I accounted for 145 patients (78.8 percent). The number of patients classified into dissatisfaction type II was 39 (21.2 percent). Of the patients categorized into type I, those undergoing revision surgeries due to an under-corrected mandibular tubercle and parasymphysis showed the most remarkable improvement in self-satisfaction score after reoperation—from 2.3 to 4.0.

Conclusion

To realize a natural-looking outcome in facial look through mandibular contouring, it is important not only to carefully consider the ratio and shape essential for an optimal slender facial contour, but also to minimize unnecessary resection of the bone.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2XlnXVm

Chondrocutaneous Bilateral Advancement Flap with Postoperative Radiation Therapy for a Helical Rim Keloid

Abstract

Keloids can be recalcitrant, and a well-planned treatment strategy is essential. Multiple ear piercings have recently become popular, particularly among younger age groups. Management of keloids that develop after piercing of the ear cartilage may be particularly problematic. Helical rim keloids are difficult to excise because of the complex, three-dimensional, cartilaginous structure of the helix and its thin and tightly adherent covering layer of skin. The chondrocutaneous advancement flap introduced by Antia and Buch may be a useful reconstructive option for a helical rim keloid after marginal loss of a segment of the helix as a result of trauma, a burn, or excision of a malignant tumor. However, this technique is limited to wounds that involve only the helix. In this technical note, we describe the use of a chondrocutaneous bilateral advancement flap with postoperative radiation therapy to treat a more invasive and relatively large keloid on the scapha. This technique is straightforward and safe in terms of preserving the blood supply. The addition of adjuvant radiation therapy can help to decrease the risk of recurrence and preserve the morphological structure of the ear and patient satisfaction.

Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2StqOYA

Commentary: Endoscopic Transaxillary Versus Inframammary Approaches for Breast Augmentation Using Shaped Implants: A Matched Case–Control Study



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2XmioG6

Invited Commentary on Caudal Septal Extension Graft Sutured with Absorbable Material and Not Fixed to the Nasal Spine Region Compared with the Conventional Fixation Method: A Retrospective Study



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2SqybQs

A Revision Mandibuloplasty: Causes, Indications, Surgical Methods and Treatment Outcomes

Abstract

Background

This paper aims to propose a classification system to categorize patients undergoing revision mandibuloplasty according to their dissatisfaction types. This paper also introduces various appropriate revision techniques and evaluates their outcomes. Through this classification system and suggested surgical techniques, surgeons can settle the disappointments experienced by patients after their primary mandibuloplasty, by realizing more natural-looking results.

Methods

The study subjects consisted of 184 patients who underwent a revision mandibuloplasty from October 2010 to March 2016, conducted by a single surgeon at a single institution. The authors were able to classify the dissatisfaction into two primary types—(1) lack of an overall slender frontal facial contour and (2) unnatural and asymmetrical overall facial appearance due to over- or inaccurate resection of the bone. A self-evaluation of patient's subjective satisfaction based on the scale from 1 to 5, both after the primary operation and after revision surgery, was compared.

Results

Dissatisfaction type I accounted for 145 patients (78.8 percent). The number of patients classified into dissatisfaction type II was 39 (21.2 percent). Of the patients categorized into type I, those undergoing revision surgeries due to an under-corrected mandibular tubercle and parasymphysis showed the most remarkable improvement in self-satisfaction score after reoperation—from 2.3 to 4.0.

Conclusion

To realize a natural-looking outcome in facial look through mandibular contouring, it is important not only to carefully consider the ratio and shape essential for an optimal slender facial contour, but also to minimize unnecessary resection of the bone.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2XlnXVm

Chondrocutaneous Bilateral Advancement Flap with Postoperative Radiation Therapy for a Helical Rim Keloid

Abstract

Keloids can be recalcitrant, and a well-planned treatment strategy is essential. Multiple ear piercings have recently become popular, particularly among younger age groups. Management of keloids that develop after piercing of the ear cartilage may be particularly problematic. Helical rim keloids are difficult to excise because of the complex, three-dimensional, cartilaginous structure of the helix and its thin and tightly adherent covering layer of skin. The chondrocutaneous advancement flap introduced by Antia and Buch may be a useful reconstructive option for a helical rim keloid after marginal loss of a segment of the helix as a result of trauma, a burn, or excision of a malignant tumor. However, this technique is limited to wounds that involve only the helix. In this technical note, we describe the use of a chondrocutaneous bilateral advancement flap with postoperative radiation therapy to treat a more invasive and relatively large keloid on the scapha. This technique is straightforward and safe in terms of preserving the blood supply. The addition of adjuvant radiation therapy can help to decrease the risk of recurrence and preserve the morphological structure of the ear and patient satisfaction.

Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2StqOYA

Commentary: Endoscopic Transaxillary Versus Inframammary Approaches for Breast Augmentation Using Shaped Implants: A Matched Case–Control Study



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2XmioG6

Invited Commentary on Caudal Septal Extension Graft Sutured with Absorbable Material and Not Fixed to the Nasal Spine Region Compared with the Conventional Fixation Method: A Retrospective Study



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2SqybQs

A Revision Mandibuloplasty: Causes, Indications, Surgical Methods and Treatment Outcomes

Abstract

Background

This paper aims to propose a classification system to categorize patients undergoing revision mandibuloplasty according to their dissatisfaction types. This paper also introduces various appropriate revision techniques and evaluates their outcomes. Through this classification system and suggested surgical techniques, surgeons can settle the disappointments experienced by patients after their primary mandibuloplasty, by realizing more natural-looking results.

Methods

The study subjects consisted of 184 patients who underwent a revision mandibuloplasty from October 2010 to March 2016, conducted by a single surgeon at a single institution. The authors were able to classify the dissatisfaction into two primary types—(1) lack of an overall slender frontal facial contour and (2) unnatural and asymmetrical overall facial appearance due to over- or inaccurate resection of the bone. A self-evaluation of patient's subjective satisfaction based on the scale from 1 to 5, both after the primary operation and after revision surgery, was compared.

Results

Dissatisfaction type I accounted for 145 patients (78.8 percent). The number of patients classified into dissatisfaction type II was 39 (21.2 percent). Of the patients categorized into type I, those undergoing revision surgeries due to an under-corrected mandibular tubercle and parasymphysis showed the most remarkable improvement in self-satisfaction score after reoperation—from 2.3 to 4.0.

Conclusion

To realize a natural-looking outcome in facial look through mandibular contouring, it is important not only to carefully consider the ratio and shape essential for an optimal slender facial contour, but also to minimize unnecessary resection of the bone.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2XlnXVm

Validation of the HYPONUT Product

Condition:   Peanut Allergy Intervention:   Other: Hyponut Sponsor:   University Hospital, Montpellier Not yet recruiting (Source: ClinicalTrials.gov)

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2VmGNtE

Characteristics of Patients Diagnosed With NSAID Sensitivity in Thailand

Conditions:   Aspirin Sensitivity;   Aspirin-exacerbated Respiratory Disease;   Aspirin-Induced Angioedema-Urticaria;   Aspirin Allergy;   NSAID-Induced Asthma;   NSAID-Induced Angioedema-Urticaria;   NSAID-Induced Anaphylactoid Reaction;   Aspirin-Induced Anaphylactoid Reaction Intervention:   Drug: aspirin, NSAIDs, paracetamol Sponsor:   Chulalongkorn University Recruiting (Source: ClinicalTrials.gov)

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2ExrPv6

A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial of MRD-based Treatment Strategy in Children and Young Adults With AML

Condition:   Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Childhood Intervention:   Other: HSCT Sponsors:   Federal Research Institute of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology;   Physicians, Innovations, Science for Children Fund Not yet recruiting (Source: ClinicalTrials.gov)

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2Vmjn7z

Impact of MEditerranean Diet, Inflammation and Microbiome After an Acute Coronary Syndrome

Condition:   Acute Coronary Syndrome Interventions:   Other: Microbiota analysis;   Other: Immunological analysis;   Other: Proteome analysis;   Other: Metabolome analysis;   Other: Clinical evaluation;   Other: Diet evaluation;   Other: MedDiet Sponsors:   Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, M.P.;   Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon;   Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana;   University of Navarra;   Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recher che Médicale, France;   Tel Aviv University;   Göteborg University Not yet recruiting (Source: ClinicalTrials.gov)

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2EwcoDy