Variability of CT Airways Measurements in COPD Patients Between Morning and Afternoon: Comparisons to Variability of Spirometric Measurements

Publication date: December 2018

Source: Academic Radiology, Volume 25, Issue 12

Author(s): Maxime Hackx, Elodie Gyssels, Tiago Severo Garcia, Isabelle De Meulder, Marie Bruyneel, Alain Van Muylem, Vincent Ninane, Pierre Alain Gevenois

Rationale and Objectives

Computed tomography (CT) airways measurements can be used as surrogates to spirometric measurements for assessing bronchodilation in a particular patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although spirometric measurements show variations within the opening hours of a hospital department, we aimed to compare the variability of CT airways measurements between morning and afternoon in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to that of spirometric measurements.

Materials and Methods

Twenty patients had pulmonary function tests and CT around 8 am and 4 pm. Luminal area (LA) and wall thickness (WT) of third and fourth generation airways were measured twice by three readers. The percentage of airway area occupied by the wall (WA%) and the square root of wall area at an internal perimeter of 10 mm (√WAPi10) were calculated. The effects of examination time, reader, and measurement session on CT airways measurements were assessed, and the variability of these measurements was compared to that of spirometric measurements.

Results

Variability of LA^3rd and LA^4th was greater than that of spirometric measurements (P values ranging from <.001 to .033). There was no examination time effect on √WAPi10, WT^3rd, LA^4th, or WA%^4th (P values ranging from .102 to .712). There was a reader effect on all CT airways measurements (P values ranging from <.001 to .028), except in WT^3rd (P > .999). There was no effect of measurement session on any CT airway measurement (P values ranging from .535 to >.999).

Conclusion

As the variability of LA^3rd and LA^4th is greater than that of spirometric measurements, clinical studies should include cohorts with larger numbers of patients when considering LA than when considering spirometric measurements as end points.

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2Kuphz9