Commentary to accompany the paper: The Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Peripheral Nerve Repair and Reconstruction

The authors are to be commended for highlighting the need for further high quality evidence to assist surgical decision making in the management of nerve injuries and for encouraging critical appraisal of available studies. Whilst it cannot be the responsibility of the individual surgeon to undertake randomised control trials (RCTs) and systematically review (SR) all available literature it is our duty of care to ensure our knowledge is best updated and our privilege to safely action innovations in our field.

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2Ra9f02