The Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Peripheral Nerve Repair and Reconstruction

While systematic reviews are regarded as the strongest level of medical evidence, inconsistency in the quality and rigor of systematic reviews raises concerns about their use as a tool in guiding quality delivery in evidence-based clinical practice. The objective of this present study was to assess methodological soundness of systematic reviews with a particular focus on peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction.We performed a comprehensive search using PubMed and Scopus to identify all systematic reviews published on peripheral nerve reconstruction in 9 high-impact surgical journals.

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2Q86rUQ