Abstract
Background
Indications of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) are conditioned by the risk of local relapse.
Objective
To evaluate prognostic factors of local relapse and local control with TLM (LC‐TLM).
Methods
Local relapse and LC‐TLM were evaluated in 1119 patients. Logistic regression and CHAID decision tree analysis were performed.
Results
Local relapse correlated to previous radiotherapy failure (8.45, CI 95%: 2.64‐27.03; P < .001), paraglottic involvement (2.42, CI: 1.41‐4.15; P = .001), anterior commissure involvement (2.12, CI: 1.43‐3.14; P < .001), grade of differentiation (1.74, CI: 1.18‐2.57; P = .005), and alcohol consumption (1.4, CI: 0.99‐1.98; P = .057). Local relapse tended to inversely correlate with experience (0.73, CI: 0.51‐1.03; P = .078). The most important factors for local relapse were previous radiotherapy failure and anterior commissure involvement.
LC‐TLM inversely correlated with previous radiotherapy failure (0.09, CI: 0.03‐0.28; P < .001), paraglottic involvement (0.25, CI: 0.14‐0.43; P < .001), anterior commissure involvement (0.49, CI: 0.32‐0.77; P = .007), margins (0.56, CI: 0.30‐1.04; P = .068), and differentiation (0.68, CI: 0.44‐1.05; P = .087). LC‐TLM correlated with experience (1.71, CI: 1.13‐2.55; P = .010). The most important factors for LC‐TLM were previous radiotherapy failure and paraglottic involvement.
Conclusion
Previous radiotherapy failure is the most important factor for local relapse and LC‐TLM. In primary treatments, anterior commissure involvement and paraglottic involvement are the most important factors for local relapse and LC‐TLM, respectively.
from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2BZwPaN
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.