Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with bone-borne versus tooth-borne distraction appliances—a systematic review

The objective was to test the hypothesis of no difference in skeletal and dental arch expansion and relapse after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with a bone-borne compared with a tooth-borne appliance. The PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals up until December 2017. No language restriction was applied. Two short-term randomized controlled trials with a low risk of bias fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2Viqn6m