Background
The relationship between blood flow characteristics and ascending aortic (AA) dilatation has not been studied in patients with a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) without aortic stenosis.
Purpose
To evaluate whether 4D flow characteristics determined in MRI are related to AA dilatation by comparing dilated AA and nondilated AA subjects with TAV.
Study Type
Prospective.
Population
Twenty patients with dilated AA and 20 age‐matched patients with nondilated AA.
Field Strength/Sequence
1.5T/4D flow, 2D flow, and anatomic images.
Assessment
Altogether, 16 different 4D flow parameters were assessed in 10 planes in the thoracic aorta. Intra‐ and interobserver reproducibility were analyzed.
Statistical Tests
Independent t‐test for normally distributed and the Mann–Whitney test for skewed distributed parameters were used. A paired‐samples t‐test was used to compare 2D and 4D flow parameters. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used in intra‐ and interobserver reproducibility analysis.
Results
Aortic flow was displaced from the centerline of the aorta in the proximal and tubular planes. Flow displacement (FD) was greatest in the proximal plane of AA and was higher in dilated AA (4.5%, range 3.0–5.8%) than in nondilated AA (2.0%, 1.0–3.0%, P < 0.001). Total wall shear stress (WSS) values were 1.3 ± 0.4 times higher on the displaced side than on the opposite side of the aorta (P < 0.01). The circumferential WSS (WSSC) ratio to total WSS was greater in dilated AA, being 0.48 ± 0.11 vs. 0.32 ± 0.09 in the inner curvature of the proximal AA (P < 0.001) and 0.37 ± 0.11 vs. 0.26 ± 0.07 in the whole aortic ring in the distal AA (P < 0.001). Depending on 4D flow parameters, reproducibility varied from excellent (ICC = 0.923) to very low (ICC = 0.204).
Data Conclusion
The present study demonstrates that 4D flow measurements help to visualize the pathological flow patterns related to aortic dilatation. Flow displacement and an increased WSSc/WSS ratio are significantly associated with AA dilatation.
Level of Evidence: 2
Technical Efficacy: Stage 2
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.
from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2W3BZu4
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.