Reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint: a comparison between prefabricated and customized alloplastic prosthetic total joint systems

Publication date: Available online 15 February 2019

Source: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Author(s): B.J. Siegmund, K. Winter, P. Meyer-Marcotty, J. Rustemeyer

Abstract

The implantation of an alloplastic total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prosthesis is an innovative approach for the treatment of end-stage TMJ disorders. Two types of system exist: prefabricated (stock) and customized computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) devices. A clinical study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of these two designs. Twenty-eight patients treated between 2015 and 2017 were included and assigned to two groups: stock prostheses (group 1) and customized CAD/CAM prostheses (group 2). Clinical evaluations were performed at five time-points up to 6 months postoperative. Parameters included maximum interincisal opening, pain, diet, complications, and subjective well-being at the end of follow-up. Differences between pre-surgery and 6-month post-surgery values were highly significant (P < 0.001). No patient required a liquid diet at the end of treatment, and 66% of group 1 patients and 100% of group 2 patients reported improved well-being. Complications were observed in 32% of patients and included temporary paralysis of the facial nerve. In conclusion, clinical outcomes of stock and CAD/CAM prostheses suggested great improvements in mouth opening and reduction of pain as a result of the rehabilitation of TMJ function. Results showed comparable data for the two types of prosthesis design at 6 months postoperative.

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2IhpBUG