Respiratory variation in peripheral arterial blood flow peak velocity to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Fluid overloading is detrimental to organ function and results in a poor prognosis. It is necessary to evaluate fluid responsiveness before fluid loading. We performed a systematic meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of the respiratory variation in peripheral arterial blood flow peak velocity (△Vpeak PA) in predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Methods

PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies that used △Vpeak PA to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. We calculated the pooled values of sensitivity, specificity and the area of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve by Meta-Disc 14.0 software.

Results

Nine studies with a total of 402 patients were included. Two low quality studies were deleted in further analysis. Moreover, because of different locations of peripheral artery, the rest included studies were divided into brachial site group and carotid site group for meta-analysis individually. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under curve were 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77–0.92), 0.86 (95% CI 0.77–0.92) and 0.9268 in carotid site group. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under curve were 0.72 (95% CI 0.60–0.81), 0.85 (95% CI 0.74–0.93) and 0.8587 in brachial site group.

Conclusions

△Vpeak of carotid and brachial artery had a diagnostic value in predicting fluid responsiveness respectively. Moreover, △Vpeak of carotid artery had more value than brachial artery in predicting fluid responsiveness. However, there was some clinical heterogeneity; therefore, further studies are needed to confirm diagnostic accuracy.

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2qKjRqP