Correction to: Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer

An error occurred in the labelling of Fig. 3, where math symbols for SUV thresholds were inverted in panel b when the EARL threshold was applied to the PSF dataset and vice versa. This figure should read as follows: Fig. 3: Prognostic value of tumour SUVmax

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2QQRy4r