Abstract
Background
In clinical trials of recurrent and metastatic head and neck carcinoma, Argiris et al have identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS), weight loss, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG‐PS), tumor primary site, tumor differentiation, prior radiotherapy, deriving a two‐group prognostic classification. This study evaluates Argiris's classification in "field‐practice" patients.
Methods
The main analysis included 327 cases; a secondary analysis excluded 31 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) p16‐positive and/or human papilloma virus (HPV)‐positive. OS and PFS curves were estimated with the Kaplan‐Meier method; multivariable Cox analyses were also performed.
Results
In the full series, OS was significantly different in patients with 0‐2 and ≥3 adverse features (median, 14 vs 10 months; P = .03). PFS was statistically different in the two groups (median, 7 vs 5 months; P = .02). At a multivariable analysis investigating additional prognostic features, site of relapse and disease‐free interval were significant predictors of OS and PFS.
Conclusion
The Argiris's model was confirmed in a "field‐practice" population. Moreover, we found additional putative prognostic factors.
from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2TVFcdo
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.