Τρίτη 5 Φεβρουαρίου 2019

A prospective comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and 51Cr-EDTA clearance for glomerular filtration rate measurement in 42 kidney transplant recipients

Publication date: Available online 4 February 2019

Source: European Journal of Radiology

Author(s): Benjamin Taton, Renaud De La Faille, Julien Asselineau, Paul Perez, Pierre Merville, Thierry Colin, Christian Combe, Steven Sourbron, Nicolas Grenier

Abstract
Objectives

To evaluate the performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) compared with the reference standard technique of urinary clearance of 51Cr-EDTA.

Patients and methods

All kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with an indication for non-urgent contrast-enhanced MRI at our institution were prospectively included between 2008 and 2012. Renographies were acquired by low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) then fitted with a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. MR-GFR was compared with reference isotopic measurements using Bland-Altman diagrams, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance rates.

Results

Forty-two KTRs (mean age 51.5 years, 26 – 74) were analyzed. Mean estimated GFR was 48.5 ± 27 mL/min/1.73m2 (24–178 mL/min). The mean bias was +13.2 mL/min (6.4–20.0, +36.9%) ranging from -31.0 mL/min (-41.7%) to +101.4 mL/min (+89.2%) with a large variability (standard-deviation: 22.3 mL/min; limits of agreement: [-30.6 (-43.3–-18.9); +57.0 (45.3–68.7)]). The ICC was 0.32 (0.02–0.56) and the concordance rate was 28.6% (14.9–42.2).

Conclusions

The large variability of MR-GFR compared with the reference technique precludes its use in KTRs, whose anatomical peculiarities make standardization of arterial input function (AIF) difficult.



from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2Gbk4No

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου

Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.