Reply

We have with great interest read the comment from Liccardi et  al1 on our article recently published in the Journal.2 We share the opinion that the male dog allergen Can f 5 is an intriguing molecule that deserves further investigation. Sensitization to Can f 5 has in several studies been shown to play a role in respiratory allergy and it is known that monose nsitization to Can f 5 occurs in a considerable proportion of dog dander–sensitized individuals. In the current study of dog dander–sensitized children we found that monosensitization to Can f 5 was associated with a negative nasal provocation test (NPT) result with dog dander extract (odds rati o, 5.78; 95% CI, 1.01-33.0). (Source: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology)

from #Head and Neck by Sfakianakis via simeraentaxei on Inoreader http://bit.ly/2DsSs2x